- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vadim Zeland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not see notability being established here. Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant reliable coverage. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, I nominated this via proposed deletion (I missed it had been PRODded a few years ago). There is no significant assertion of notability (self-publishing books on Amazon is not an assertion of notability), it is unreferenced and I have looked and cannot find reliable references, and it is promotional in tone. Fish+Karate 09:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete. There is some coverage, eg [1], [2], but they are passing mentions and/or sources of dubious reliability; I'm not finding any slam-dunk evidence of notability. Vanamonde (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.