Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Views on Shia Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Views on Shia Islam

procedural nomination Three previous AFD actions were against articles that are now redirects to the present article, which was nominated for PROD deletion. PROD nominator states: "Original research, POV". The previous AFD actions were 9 Sept 2005, 2 Feb 2006 and 26 Mar 2006. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, inherently POV article. Claim and fact is unencyclopedia and misses diversity and nuance within Shia views. We need subarticles on issue areas of Shia Islam... not an article like this. It'd be nice for someone to mirror this on a userpage if it gets deleted since some of this information can probably be used elsewhere. gren グレン 07:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OR. Keb25 07:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but keep an archive somewhere as an example of how an article should not written--Victor falk 13:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per gren. CRGreathouse (t | c) 17:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a totally biased and POV article. → AA ^(talk) — 14:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this hate article has no place in rational thought let alone on Wikipedia. It is disgustingly bias and flouts NPOV standards. --Bigbrisco 15:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article was initially titled "Misconceptions about the Shi'a", and though the title had since been neutralised, the article continues in that vein of bias and OR. ITAQALLAH 11:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Poorly written, POV article. An NPOV article on the subject would be useful, but this article is far from being that. John Carter 15:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.