Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warner exemption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to FTS2000. Sandstein 10:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warner exemption

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Warner exemption (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if this should warrant it own article per WP:GNG. Imcdc (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to FTS2000, where the content already also resides. Nate • (chatter) 02:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to FTS2000 per Mrschimpf. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 07:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.