Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZeptoLab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ZeptoLab

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

ZeptoLab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst the 'Cut the Rope' game is clearly notable, I don't think the company ZeptoLab actually is. They only get a passing mention in most of the sources - I am yet to find significant coverage of ZeptoLab - and this is reflected in the content of the article. The article's main content is about 'Cut the Rope' and otherwise only serves as a list of Cut the Rope spin-off games they have created, which we already have at Cut the Rope (video game). OXYLYPSE (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Games, and Companies. OXYLYPSE (talk) 11:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Cut the Rope as an WP:ATD, the article looks like it discusses the game as a franchise. – The Grid (talk) 13:10, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I found several sources: Pocket Gamer [1] [2], The Village [3], Kommersant [4], GQ Russia [5], Venturebeat [6], Fast Company [7] [8], Bloomberg [9]. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:39, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Not all, but most, of the references listed by Jovamilic97 meet WP:ORGCRIT so that would put it over the hurdle for meeting WP:NCORP. Coupled by the book references found I would say the company is more than notable. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per others, clearly notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep; significant Russian sources signify notability. But the article certainly needs WP:FIXABLE significant work. IgelRM (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.