Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 3

June 3

edit

Category:Jeon dishes in Korean cuisine

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Was previously speedy requested but procedurally denied. Matching parent article Jeon (food). Curent title is verbose grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Philosophers by X subfield and Y nationality

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 18#Category:Philosophers by X subfield and Y nationality

Category:Sports competitions in Scandinavia

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/rename * Pppery * it has begun... 01:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The first category was created during a renaming/reframing discussion of its parent category Category:Sport in Scandinavia and there is now an overlap with the second category. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That they are allowed doesn't mean that they are useful when most in the region concern Nordic countries. These are the five articles currently in the category:
There is no reason to have this category tree with only one article (RL) being specifically about Scandinavia. (Noting that Scandinavia in English may mean up to five countries, however Category:Scandinavian countries, Category:Sport in Scandinavia, and Category:Sports competitions in Scandinavia all group/grouped the respective three-country Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) categories.)
Kaffet i halsen (talk) 18:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Irish natural philosophers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Dual merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCLOCATION: This is the only split of this category by nationality, and it's not a useful distinguisher Psychastes (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with Sandleford, Berkshire

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename and purge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge per WP:OCASSOC. "People from" is the norm, articles that are not about people from Sandleford should be purged. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Eastern Chalukyas

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Soft delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, only one article in each. The kings subcategory suffices (with Eastern Chalukyas as main article). Marcocapelle (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of festivals by region

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 18#Category:Lists of festivals by region

Category:Miyagi Prefecture railway station stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete both the category and the template * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Has served it's purpose, but now it's time for it to go along with Template:Miyagi-railstation-stub because there are only the template remaining inside. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have tagged the template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rouen geography stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Arrondissement of Rouen geography stubs. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:23, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I found this French arrondissement geography stub category that don't have the word "arrondissement" in there. - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It, and the two following nominations, refers to the arrondissements in the article Arrondissements of the Seine-Maritime department, and not only the cities themselves – a larger area than the category and eponymous article refer to. It would be more cohesive to rename it (and probably all other arrondissements) to Category:Arrondissement of Rouen geography stubs et cetera after the articles (Arrondissement of Rouen) and remove the three from Category:Rouen, Category:Le Havre, Category:Dieppe (these are the only three, at least in Normandy, that are put into the city category). Kaffet i halsen (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Le Havre geography stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Arrondissement of Le Havre geography stubs. Part of the rationale is expressed in this discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I found this French arrondissement geography stub category that don't have the word "arrondissement" in there. - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dieppe geography stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Arrondissement of Dieppe geography stubs. Part of the rationale is expressed in this discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I found this French arrondissement geography stub category that don't have the word "arrondissement" in there. - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taiwanese canoeist stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete both the category and the template * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one other article in the category, alongside the template... - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat03:38, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, upmerge template to Taiwanese sportspeople stubs and canoeist stubs. Waacstats (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have tagged the template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Prisons in Nebraska

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category includes both jails and prisons, there is a distinction between the two in American English. –DMartin 16:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

First arrivals

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename/purge/re-parent * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge/rename/purge/re-parent, the categories are currently an odd mix of ships, biographies and articles about groups of people. As there is already a category for migrant ships it is better to integrate them. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2020s Western (genre) film stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete both the category and the template * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This template shouldn't have its own category, since stub categories require 60 or more transclusions from their respective templates - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:23, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have tagged the template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anninsky District geography stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (tc) 09:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are not enough transclusions of the template to warrant its own stub category (there must be at least 60 transclusions) - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ertilsky District geography stubs

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (tc) 09:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There are not enough transclusions of the template to warrant its own stub category (there must be at least 60 transclusions) - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat02:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that there are enough to populate these stubs? There are are over 600 stubs in the merge target. SMasonGarrison 03:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Quranic scholars

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Alt rename * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There doesn't seem to be a significant distinction between the two. They could also be merged the other way around, but the second category has more pages so it would take longer. Qualiesin (talk) 04:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Riize members

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The Bushranger One ping only 03:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: It's been accepted through precedent and as defined by Category:Musicians by band that single-member categories for groups should not exist. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:11, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad I motivated you to create a second article to add to the category. I'm good if this is kept. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on this now that it has two members?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moldavian Jews

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 01:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, trivial intersection of ethnicity and historicsl region. In contrast to its subcategory, this category contains Jewish people after the Principality of Moldovia had become part of Romania. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you mean the Principality of Moldavia. – Fayenatic London 09:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Period pieces

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/rename as nominated. The consensus here is very weak, but in an entire month of discussion nobody has clearly opposed the nomination, and on the issue of which direction to merge the one person who expressed a clear opinion preferred "historical", and so it goes. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging and/or renaming all of these categories:
My reasoning: Considering the fact that the Costume drama and Period piece pages both redirect back to the Historical drama article, I'm not sure why we have all these other separate categories for these synonymous terms. Most of the categories I listed above are just completely redundant to very similar preexisting counterpart categories. Merging or renaming these categories accordingly should be mostly straightforward...
...With the exception of most of the subcategories under Category:Period television series, which have rather unintentionally vague names implying overly broad scopes; they seem to be both for historical fiction TV shows listed by nationality of whatever studio produced them, AND also for whatever country that these shows' stories use as in-universe settings.
I'm not sure whether to merge/rename the "X period television series" categories to "Y historical television series (by national origin)" or "Television series about the history of Z (country of setting)". So yeah, this will need further discussion to figure and sort it all out. AHI-3000 (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/rename or reverse merge, with redirecting in either case, we do not need two pairs of categories but I am not sure if "period" or "historical" is the more common term. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:27, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment For the genre films, its not clear these are "real" genres. I've only heard of Historical drama and Historical adventure in context of more discussed or used regularly as genres. The others (as either period or historical) seem a bit iffy. Does historical implied a recreation of an event or people that happened? or is period just to set for fictional stories set in the past? I'm a bit back and forth on these kind of excessive hybrids. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus to merge in one direction, thoughts on which term to use?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I consider myself widely read, but "period piece" or "period television series" are meaningless to me. "Historical" I can at least comprehend. (For the avoidance of doubt, there is no exaggeration in that.) YMMD. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What!? Thank you. Missing text added. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Breton people

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus without prejudice against speedy renomination; given that an article now exists the weak "keep" consensus that would otherwise be found here is void and this is best redone from scratch against the current situation. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Option A
Option B
Nominator's rationale: merge or rename, a denonym suggests a nationality (not applicable here) or an ethnicity (hardly maintainable). We mean people who lived in the province and "from" covers that the best, just like the parent category already has that. Personally I prefer option A because option B leads to hyper specific categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See earlier discussion: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 August 9#Category:17th-century Breton people. Pinging Dimadick and Peterkingiron who were involved. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:12, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose both I agree with Ham II, there is no point in having a "Province of Brittany" category when there is no main article and the geographic scope is not defined. Dimadick (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on this now that an article exists?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 16:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bob Fosse

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON. "Works by..." tree is preferred. --woodensuperman 12:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tom Hanks

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON. Can be dealt with by the "works by..." category tree. --woodensuperman 12:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Plantations in Aruba

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 2-article category. Merge recently suggested here: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_May_15#Category:Coconut_plantations_in_Aruba Gjs238 (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Plantations in Suriname

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1-article category Gjs238 (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Albanian cardiologists

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also propose merging to Category:Albanian physicians.

Also nominating for merge:


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation (Jordan)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 16#Category:Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation (Jordan)

Category:Coffee table book writers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Vague category, WP:SUBJECTIVECAT Psychastes (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.