Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut/Latest article changes

Recent changes

edit

Recent changes to WikiProject Connecticut pages.

Alerts

edit

Recent developments to pages under the scope of WikiProject Connecticut. For an archive of older alerts, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut/Article alerts/Archive.

Did you know

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

Redirects for discussion

Good article nominees

Articles to be split

Assessment log

edit

Recently assessed or reevaluated WikiProject Connecticut pages.


August 29, 2025

edit

Assessed

edit

August 28, 2025

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

August 27, 2025

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

August 26, 2025

edit

Reassessed

edit
  • Pequot (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

edit

August 25, 2025

edit

Reassessed

edit

August 24, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

Removed

edit

August 23, 2025

edit

Renamed

edit

Reassessed

edit

Assessed

edit

Deletion discussions

edit

Transcluded from and further information found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Connecticut.


Connecticut

edit
Yang Liu (immunologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page with a very large number of sources that fail verification, or are irrelevant. Of the five references on his career [1-5] only [2] is valid, the rest not. If I remove all the unverified material not much is left. I also cannot find enough via GS or Google to verify independently as his name is too common. As a failure of WP:V I think it needs a delete. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Middletown Adult Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with no sources - seems with only local interest - fails WP:NCORP - has tag for notability since 2014. Asteramellus (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Palmer (commentator) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG; entire article is unsourced Joeykai (talk) 18:11, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) *Delete per nom. Fails SIGCOV. Herinalian (talk) 18:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Bennett (librarian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has an interesting history. It was started in 2006 as a mass of unsourced fluff, and was whittled down over time to one still mostly unsourced line. In that nearly two-decade span, either no one has either had the interest to expand and source this, or there are not sources to do it with. BD2412 T 16:24, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Connecticut. BD2412 T 16:24, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails GNG and WP:NACADEMIC, and there are likely no other sources available to expand the article. Ckfasdf (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Same reasons as above, and agree the article is unlikely to ever expand/improve. Leonstojka (talk) 20:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Librarians are often not notable and generally need to go through WP:GNG, but we have no in-depth independent sourcing. There is some depth at [6] but not independent. However he was a humanities professor before he was a librarian so there is still some hope of WP:AUTHOR notability through reviews of his books; the books are listed among his publications at [7]. I could not find any reviews of The Family Library, 1825-1835: the uses of literacy in a revolutionary age (his dissertation, ProQuest 302236605, later republished). I did find a small number of reviews of two edited volumes: Art and Error: Modern Textual Editing: JSTOR 3722991, JSTOR 513289; The Altrurian Romances: JSTOR 2923930. Because these are edited volumes they don't count for as much with me as if they were authored books and I don't think this is enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete as per David Eppstein. I note that as a BLP, the burden is on those who want to keep. Bearian (talk) 08:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]