This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Actors and filmmakers. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Actors and filmmakers|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Actors and filmmakers. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Purge page cache watch
Scan for actor AfDs

Scan for filmmaker AfDs


Actors and filmmakers

edit
Tya Arifin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NACTRESS, as the subject fails at least two of the criteria there. At present, she is more notable for being the stepdaughter-in-law of Siti Nurhaliza, a well-known Malaysian singer, as even stated in the lead section. This makes the article a case of WP:INVALIDBIO Ckfasdf (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gwendoline Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This heavily promotional stub is about an actress who does not pass WP:NACTOR, as she has played only supporting roles in notable productions. She also fails WP:GNG, the closest thing to SIGCOV in a reliable source she's received is a couple sentence-long passing mentions such as this for being cast in Spartacus: War of the Damned. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Avinaash V. Rai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independent coverage to justify a standalone article. - The9Man Talk 10:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dian Rana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT, also borderline self promotion or COI. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the article on the same subject was speedy-deleted on id.wiki under A7 and salted due to multiple recreation. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And, note that the article's creator has an editing history focused solely on this article, which raises a COI concern. Also, the article was previously rejected multiple times during the AfC process before the creator eventually published it himself. Ckfasdf (talk) 08:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The subject meets the general notability guideline (WP:GNG) through multiple reliable, independent sources with significant coverage, including Liputan6, Tempo, Merdeka, TVOne, and international publication Rest of World. These are not trivial mentions but substantial profiles covering the subject's public engagement and role in documenting the development of Indonesia's new capital.
While the article may have been initially drafted with assistance, it has since been entirely rewritten and supported with verifiable sources. It is not promotional in tone and has been reviewed carefully for neutrality.
Therefore, the article meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria and should be kept. Nusantarakita (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 18:40, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Glenn Meldrum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACTOR. Only 1 significant role in The Saddle Club. Other aspects of career like a dog walker don't add to notability. LibStar (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sahu Garapati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT. The article relies heavily on press releases, interviews, and routine announcements that do not provide significant independent coverage. Most sources are primary or about the movies which he produced. The available third-party mentions do not establish lasting encyclopedic notability. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Best Feature Film category is often awarded to the producer and is the prize recognizing the producer's work. Producers are considered the head of a film project above the director which is why this prize is typically designed to acknowledge them at film prize ceremonies. That's true of most film prizes with that category such as Academy Award for Best Picture which is the American equivalent of the award won by Garapati in India. Other times it goes to both producer and director such as the BAFTA Award for Best Film. I'd have to look deeper at the by-laws of this prize to determine what's true in this case. Regardless, even if you want to split hairs and say it is to the film; the award makes him pass criteria 4 of WP:FILMMAKER even if the award was given to the film and not the producer. Either way he passes an WP:SNG and is therefore notable.4meter4 (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to explain your view. I see where you’re coming from, but I’m not fully convinced that WP:FILMMAKER #4 applies in this case. That criterion talks about someone who has created or co-created a significant work, and from what I understand, producing a film—even one that won a National Award—doesn’t always mean the person was directly involved in the creative side of making it. Unless we can show that his role went beyond financing and production management into actual creative contribution, I’m not sure it fits the intent of that guideline. I do agree the award itself is prestigious and worth noting, but for me it doesn’t seem like an automatic pass under FILMMAKER #4 without clearer evidence of his individual role. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I think this is splitting hairs, and in a way that general scholarship on film doesn't do. I don't think you are going to find much support that a film with only one credited producer that won the top film prize at a national level isn't going to specifically pass criteria 4c at FILMMAKER.4meter4 (talk) 18:21, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The film he produced won the National Award, which Garapati rightfully holds it. For example, producer Dil Raju received the National Award (source) and (video). Similarly, producer Karan Johar has also been a recipient of two National Awards in 2023 and 2024, as confirmed by official press release by the government of India [1] and [2].
Hence, he is a National Award-winning producer, where he holds it for the film he produced. Viswajith105 (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Clerence Chyntia Audry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:NACTRESS Ckfasdf (talk) 01:31, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Daniel Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Jonathan_Daniel_Brown. The subject is complaining about their participation in a pornographic film shortly prior to the beginning of their mainstream acting career (ultimately sourced to the tabloid TMZ and repeated by other tabloid sources as well as pornographic trade publications) being repeatedly restored to the article despite the BLP subject's objection. They seem relatively low profile and I am not sure they meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NFILMMAKER given their limited number of roles (while his lead role in Project X (2012 film), is undeniably notable, NACTOR requires multiple notable roles in high profile films) and the current sources do not appear to give many biographical details that would allow for a reasonable biography of this individual. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajas Pukkadan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NACTOR and looks more of a WP:TOOSOON with no notable WP:RS Agent 007 (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A. B. Dahlan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:ENT, but was blocked by a likely banned user editing from an IP address Ckfasdf (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nomination. MayhemStoppingBy (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Amel Carla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:NACTRESS, but was blocked by a likely banned user editing from an IP address Ckfasdf (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nomination. MayhemStoppingBy (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Annie Krohn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and WP:NACTRESS, but was blocked by a likely banned user editing from an IP address Ckfasdf (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiromi Nishida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG Onel5969 TT me 13:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Paparusso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This article was previously deleted through AfD for lack of valid secondary sourcing. This issue still exists. The new sources from 2025 added to this article are all puff pieces generated by LLMs: "Long before Nicola Paparusso emerged as a leading advocate for diversity in fashion, his professional journey was firmly anchored in the spheres of politics and media—fields where strategy, communication, and influence intertwine." and "In today’s digital era, where viral fame can skyrocket overnight, the role of a discerning talent manager has become indispensable." I also suspect the subject to be engaging in Brown envelope journalism as the professionally taken portrait photo has been professionally retouched in Adobe and shared with all the new news articles from 2025 and magically appears in his infobox. The creator of this article swears that they don't have a WP:COI but I don't believe them (see their talk page for convo). Also, the Order of Malta has 13,500 knights and the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic has 160,285 members, therefore, the simple fact of having these orders does not confer notability in itself. I don't see any valid sources from Italian media either, just blogs. I also kindly request the deleting admin to salt this article, thank you. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 11:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Several Italian RS confirm that SMOM. An interview with the subject also indicates support from African institutions, like the Senegal’s Ministry of Culture, so I wouldn't be surprised by all the African coverage he's getting in West Africa. Furthermore, the subject has received national honors and has been covered in independent, reliable, and verifiable sources—particularly when corroborated by the Italian references. The subject passes WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.--Afí-afeti (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Suvendu Ghosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor to unreliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavini Purohit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. The subject has only two credits, neither in a lead role, and both in non-notable films. Also, the article has already been deleted 3 times (2 via speedy deletion and 1 through AfD). Ckfasdf (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Hung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet general or actor notability. No independent reliable sources found on search. --Seawolf35 T--C 18:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Savile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG - insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources are primarily promotional materials, personal profiles, and self-published content. While subject is a working actor, no evidence of significant coverage meeting WP:ENTERTAINER guidelines. Keironoshea (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tzadik Penimi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The two articles that have any depth-of-coverage are clearly press releases or paid coverage (one is clearly tagged as such at the bottom). Beyond that, I don't see any independent third-party coverage to meet WP:BIO threshold. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:55, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are independent reliable sources. All of them were generated by Penimi or his publicist. Softlavender (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You says this yet if it were Variety or The Hollywood Reporter, NY Times, etc it could be to. It's hard to know what's TRUE independent ethical journalism. Wikipedia isn't here to investigate morals and motivations. This is supposed to be a repository of free access to information. The reader is responsible for deciding what to believe. 2600:1700:1030:8C60:BCF2:56A0:6A82:27BD (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2600:1700:1030:8C60:BCF2:56A0:6A82:27BD (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
What a strange comment. Those publications have editorial oversight. And no, this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not the Yellow Pages or a collection of improperly referenced claims about living people. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added AppleTV and TV.nu(German streaming platform) which get information directly from distributers/studios referencing subjects associations with certain projects. This should address both notability/citation related issues. DoubtingJacob (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If need be this article can be converted to a biographical https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SST&redirect=no DoubtingJacob (talk) 02:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A stub is not a valid alternative to a topic that does not meet the notability standard. "Stub" just means "very short". If you read the links you post carefully, this would be very obvious. DMacks (talk) 02:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at several stub articles of people there are in many cases only one or some cases two references. Also in many just ImDb which I put to begin with but it was disagreed with as not an acceptable source. DoubtingJacob (talk) 02:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFF is one of the weakest arguments possible. Please let us know those other articles that also do not meet our standards so they can be improved or deleted. But "number of references" also is not critical. It's how strong they are, for verifying notability. DMacks (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – The subject has demonstrated sufficient accomplishments to meet notability guidelines, and reliable sources can be added to improve coverage. While the article is at an initial stage of development, it has a solid foundation that can be expanded and improved over time. Deletion is premature when constructive enhancement is clearly possible. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 01:23, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bryan MacKinnon, it would be helpful if you had a closer look at the actual sources. Drmies (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      If the sources/references are the concern, why not tag it with refimprove? The author has shown a willingness to take suggestions and make changes. Too often, it seems that many of these deletion discussions expect an article to be highly advanced when first published rather than anticipating it will improve over time. Once nominated, the burden shifts to the article’s creator to prove it meets notability guidelines—often discouraging contributors. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      When the best sources that a WP:COI SPA can come up with are press releases/promotional fluff, it seems unlikely that there are actual usuable sources in existence. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:38, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      This is feeling like ABF of the other participants here, who looked in detail at the provided refs and (at least on my part) actually looked for references ourselves. DMacks (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Although we have claims to being a key crew of many films, we don't have WP:RS about any of them or about him as a person. I'm concerned that as far as I can see none of the articles for the films to which he is reported to have contributed mentioned him until this article was created and the user-generated/unreliable-sources started pouring in. Several of the cited refs for details of certain films that are potentially reliable do not list him at all. That could be a massive omission (but one that we are stuck with following, by WP sourcing/DUE rules), or else a massive joke being played. WP:V and WP:GNG/etc are the rules we have, and we need V of the GNG/etc, not just claims of GNG/etc and V of other details associated with the claimed topics. Need at least some actual RS to prove this has a kernel of a potential article even in draft-space. DMacks (talk) 04:13, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Navya Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not appear to meet GNG. Most coverage is routine, event-based, or interview-style, without sustained in-depth discussion in multiple independent reliable source. Thilsebatti (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Varghese (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very limited coverage from independent reliable sources. Routine coverage about film announcements and production. Fails GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this article for deletion because I am questioning the subject's notability. The few sources currently provided have reliability issues and are not placed or cited correctly. Much of the information appears to be unsourced or poorly sourced, which raises verifiability concerns. Without sufficient high-quality sources, the subject does not merit a standalone article per Wikipedia's inclusion standards.

GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 00:44, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I beilive the sources are reliable and the kickboxer is quite popular in the full contact kickboxing scene in the old school era as for the citation I’ll fix them. What do you think? If final decision comes to deletion I’d prefer moving it to draft.Judgejury28 (talk) 00:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Judgejury28, the sources are still not formatted properly and there is unnecessary spacing. Also, IMDB is not a proper source and the Vocal.media source isn’t even loading. Please fix these problems and try to find more reliable sources, thanks. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 01:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will and also help would be appreciated thanks for your time. Judgejury28 (talk) 02:26, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nadia Ali (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2017 AfD was snowed in favor of retaining the article. I believe this was incorrect. The subject fails ANYBIO. The subject has not received a well known honor nor has the person made a widely recognized contribution to the field. The claim to fame is basically “Muslim adult performer.” This performer post-dates Mia Khalifa’s hijab scene, so Nadia Ali is not any sort of “first,” in the field. Even if she were, what exactly is her contribution here? There were remarks in the first AfD that she was threatened and it got coverage. A woman was threatened online? Hardly a man bites dog situation. If one wants to argue ANYBIO, how was adult entertainment changed by her brief time in the industry? It was not. Even then, ANYBIO (which I maintain she does not meet) is merely a likelihood, not a guarantee. There is substantial overlap between ANYBIO and WP:ENT, so this might be a little redundant, BUT she did not star in many adult films and as I mention in why I believe the subject fails ANYBIO, her short-lived career did not have a unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Even the sources themselves state she did a small number of scenes. WP:EVENT would not consider her notable for any of the scenes had they gone viral.

The other argument is WP:GNG. The sourcing in the article is such: There are two Daily Beast interviews and a quote of her all written by the same author (an actual notable performer). For the purposes of GNG, this would be a single source only if those interviews are considered sufficiently independent of the subject. The other sources are also interviews and press releases.

In the first AfD, someone listed a bunch of sources as a rebuttal. The problem is some run afoul of WP:NEWSORGINDIA and the repetitive natures of those that don’t run afoul make me question the intellectual independence and if such a list was confusing existence with notability. Mpen320 (talk) 00:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Pinset (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician/producer. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Lots of namedropping but notability is not inherited from anyone he worked with. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suzana Ansar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in depth coverage in independent reliable source. Sources used in the article are closely associated with the subject and some are trivial mentions. Rht bd (talk) 12:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:11, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Naila Nayem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable works to be mentioned in significant independent reliable source. Rht bd (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: নায়লা নাঈম is the subject's native name so searching might be more successful that way.
Wow-wee and a half, what a train wreck of an article/AfD history. I will try and summarize the useful bits of the past AfDs so that we don't need to flip between 5 different pages.
  1. The bn wiki afd predates the creation of this article in en and might be of use to editors who can read it.
  2. Original (8 Feb 2015): First EN AfD brought by Ibrahim Husain Meraj closes as No Consensus after Zayeem says they can see enough articles to meet WP:GNG but doesn't provide any of them.
  3. 2nd nomination (28 Feb 2015): Ibrahim Husain Meraj starts another AfD six days after the previous one closes, procedurally speedy kept (after 3 weeks)
  4. 3rd nomination (19 Oct 2015): SwisterTwister starts third AfD. Numerous editors claim notability and link to Google search results. Panyd first advances a claim of WP:NENT which Ibrahim Husain Meraj rebuts with no evidence on either side. Closes as keep.
  5. 4th nomination (8 Dec 2017): Mar11 starts the fourth AfD claiming that her participation in Run Out (film) is not enough to be notable and that she has no other claims. Vinegarymass911 and Ammarpad argue keep providing [13], [14], [15] and other links that have since 404ed. The rest of the AfD got distracted by discussion about the bn wiki version and eventually closed as No Consensus.
Moritoriko (talk) 00:37, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lemis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable due to lack of significant independent sources. Rht bd (talk) 20:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Strehlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm struggling to see the notability of this subject. He has a highly notable family and there is coverage of him in relation to his family, but not really individually. The biography he wrote might make the benchmark for an article for him, but it's pretty borderline. He doesn't seem notable as a theatremaker. Boneymau (talk) 07:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of his theatrical work, his Triad Stage Alliance was the first Australian company to perform on the Edinburgh Fringe. They also won a Fringe First for that performance. In my opinion, that gives Strehlow some degree of relevance, even if it's just for the Edinburgh Fringe. He also wrote a number of plays that were successful throughout Europe. That, on top of his biographical work, justifies the existence of a John Strehlow article. Dr. Johnny (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment In 19 years on Wikipedia, I have rarely, if ever, seen such an over-written article. It is also badly under-referenced, except for a lot of incomplete references, usually missing titles and page numbers, to theatre reviews that are, apparently, not available online. I have greatly reduced the cruft/fluff/trivia, though I think the article should really be cut back quite a bit more. Two of the "citations" aren't even citations, just lists of critics who supposedly reviews his book, and nearly all very incomplete, missing the title of the source(!) and have no page number or url. I'm not convinced that running an Australian theatre company that was supposedly (cite needed?) the first to perform at the Edinburgh Fringe theatre festival, even if that could be verified, makes him or it notable. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:19, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The terrible current state can be alleviated somewhat by going back a year in the history (prior to the major changes emanating from Washington of all places). His book The Tale of Frieda Keysser was reviewed in Aboriginal History, The Monthly and The Weekend Australian. Maybe could be handled differently, eg by moving to an article on the book with some background on the author but that does not require deleting. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aboriginal History is a journal. Review is in Volume 36, 2012, four page (203-206) review by Regina Ganter from Griffith University. -- added by Duffbeerforme
The Monthly
The Weekend Australian, ~2190 word review by Nicholas Rothwell, 11 Feb 2012.
What is the title of the article in Aboriginal history? What is the title and page no. or url of the article in The Weekend Australian? -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:04, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Title and page number of Weekend Australian added, no url I know of, is available in NewsBank. PDF of Book reviews section of Aboriginal History [16]. Journal info [17]. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:50, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
the article "False witness" in The Australian 10 November 2020 by Amos Aikman also helps. May be available online behind a paywall titled "Was Walter Baldwin Spencer a forger and a fraud?". duffbeerforme (talk) 07:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 13:25, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete


Shameem Akhtar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor and unreliable sources which fail to demonstrate notability of this filmmaker making two non notable movies. Rht bd (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nithish Sahadev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a director with only one released feature film and no significant coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources demonstrating lasting notability. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:41, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:12, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keri Rene Fuller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability per WP:NACTOR. While the subject has appeared in Broadway productions, the sources provided consist primarily of routine casting announcements, fan wiki entries, and basic promotional coverage rather than the "significant coverage in reliable sources" required by WP:BIO. The references include fan wikis (Six the Musical Wiki, Cats Musical Wiki), casting announcements, and brief mentions, but lack substantial independent coverage demonstrating why this performer merits encyclopedic inclusion. No evidence of major awards, significant critical recognition, or other achievements that would clearly establish notability beyond routine professional work. The viral social media moments mentioned do not constitute the type of lasting, encyclopedic significance required for inclusion. Keironoshea (talk) 13:16, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thilsebatti (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Kotapadi J Rajesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources showcase his productions without providing significant independent analysis of his notability as a subject. Many of the references are announcements or industry updates. Fails GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 11:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:12, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Passes criteria 3 of WP:PRODUCER. We have nine films with stand alone articles which the subject has produced. Those all have independent critical reviews supporting them, so the subject clearly meets the SNG guideline. In future reference to the nominator, producers/directors with multiple films that meet GNG on the encyclopedia are likely to meet our SNG criteria. Historically that's how things go at AFD.4meter4 (talk) 12:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 14:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shigeo Koshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable director. The article was PROD'ed for this reason, which I endorsed because of it citing mostly unreliable sources (IMDb and the encyclopedia of Anime News Network, not sure about MUBI, but I know Rotten Tomatoes is reliable), but it was dePROD'ed by another user who claimed he meets WP:DIRECTOR. (Upon further inspection, that doesn't seem to be the case because I don't see the article meeting any of the 4 criteria mentioned there.) Couldn't find any reliable sources showing significant coverage of Koshi via a Google search. A Google News search showed nothing. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 13:19, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I concur that this is a clear WP:CREATIVE pass with multiple notable credits. DCsansei (talk) 23:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 15:51, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Another attempt at consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 20:17, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment: As is my longtime practice, I would like at least three reliable sources added to the article, along with context. Nowadays, with the current situation, we need to be concerned about poorly sourced BLPs. Bearian (talk) 04:18, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Visakh Subramaniam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current article relies mainly on promotional interviews and routine coverage tied to specific releases. There’s little independent, in-depth sourcing that focuses on him as a subject apart from the films themselves. Without stronger coverage in reliable, independent sources that goes beyond routine film news, it’s difficult to establish notability. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:46, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. He is the producer of five films on which we have stand alone articles. It would be hard to square that he doesn't meet criteria 3 of WP:PRODUCER if those films are indeed notable enough to have their own pages.4meter4 (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Thanks to LastJabberwocky for the source analysis, and to DeeMC1970 for providing numerous sources. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:31, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Davies (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources used in the article either doesn't significantly cover Dan Davis or involve interviews with Davis, both of which doesn't add to the article's notability. Initially, I redirected him to Ed Gein, the Musical that seems to be his most significant work. The redirect was contested by user:DeeMC1970 on my talk page. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 04:44, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
      Mentioned as one of the stars of A Trip to Jamaica No
  Affiliated source; bio published by the radio talk show that released a documentary starring Davies.   ~ No
  Interview     No
~ Sem-interview     Has details on "West of Thunder", the film that stars Davies, but nothing specific to Davies No
      Mentioned in the credits No
  Interview No
    Local Appleton, Wisconsin newspaper that seems to be reliable   Yes
    Local Appleton, Wisconsin newspaper that seems to be reliable   Yes
  Podcast interview No
  Film about Dan Davies in Nollywood. I cannot access youtube to properly assess the film.     ? Unknown
    University paper usually unreliable per WP:RSSM   No
  Cannot access this source.     ? Unknown
      Passing mention No
  Interview   Coverage by a university project No
  Inteview No
  Inteview No
  Interview No
      Passing mention No
      Dan Davies isn't mentioned in the article. No
~ Semi-interview     The article is mostly preoccupied with 2026 remake of The Giant Spider Invasion starring Davies. Davies, in particular, doesn't have SIGCOV. No
  Interview No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
  • My assessment of sources presented by DeeMC1970. There are two sources that decisively specific to Davies and contribute to notability; and one source that mostly talks about 2026 remake of The Giant Spider Invasion starring Davies and a little bit about Davis. I don't this is enough for an encyclopedic page for Davies. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 08:40, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear LastJabberwocky,
I know you are not doing this on purpose but you have misspelled Dan Davies' last name numerous times...his name is Davies...not Davis...thank you.
To answer your questions and to gently correct you there are more than two sources in my non-exhaustive list that are completely Dan Davies specific. And here they are....
USA Today - Gannett-Wisconsin https://www.postcrescent.com/story/entertainment/2021/03/11/dan-davies-reflects-career-book-rantings-madman-facebook/6892890002/
USA Today - Gannett-Wisconsin https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/2017/07/27/appletons-davies-named-best-supporting-actor-comedy/513901001/
Ameritif Podcast - Dan Davies Interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPHhEaMAVWk
A Journal of the Plague Year (Created by Arizona State University in conjunction with 15 other national & international Universities) Dan Davies Oral History - https://covid-19archive.org/s/archive/item/58892
Rex Sikes Movie Beat Talks with Producer, Actor, Writer Dan Davies - https://podbay.fm/p/rex-sikes-movie-beat/e/1585497600
Dan Davies on Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK-3) on the Mental Ideas Radio Podcast (Over 10 million listeners) https://missadventurerthk.com/2020/06/04/trolls-anonymous-mental-ideas-podcast/
Late Nite with Pete Schwaba - Civic Media- Heard on 23 radio stations throughout the Midwest and worldwide on the internet Dan Davies Interview (Dan has been interviewed numerous times on this show) https://civicmedia.us/shows/nite-lite/2025/03/10/long-movieshour-1
Also Dan has been the subject of two award winning short films about his life, career and family. These were created by Len Borrusso (aka Len Eb) Len is an award winning filmmaker who has worked in Hollywood for years. Here is Len's professional website http://www.leneb.com/ and here's his IMDb page - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1808761/and here are links to all award winning films about Dan Davies' life, career and family. "Life with Dan" - IMDb page - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9440654/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_cdt_t_6
"Ballad of a Mushroom Cloud" A short film about Dan and his Grandfather - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt25134638/?ref_=nm_flmg_job_1_cdt_t_12
I am also attaching more links to interviews and articles that are more Dan Davies specific. Again this is not a non-exhaustive list... but also remember that most actors and writers are inextricably linked to their film projects so most articles about them mention their films liberally since that is their life's work and is essential to what makes them notable and/or 'famous".
NPR-PRI To the Best of Our Knowledge ( Dan Davies Interview on National Public Radio program heard on over 300 radio stations US nationwide - https) ://www.ttbook.org/interview/dan-davies-ed-gein-musical
PBS "Director's Cut" Dan Davies Interview - https://pbswisconsin.org/watch/directors-cut/directors-cut-dan-davies-steve-russell-ed-gein-the-musical/
Waupaca County Post - Following His Passion (Dan Davies Interview) - https://www.waupacanow.com/stories/following-his-passion,23425
Special Mark Productions (Dan Davies Interview) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2g4ZM76yN4
Spectrum News (Wisconsin's Own Star (Dan Davies) Brings His Movie Premiere to Appleton) Davies https://spectrumnews1.com/wi/milwaukee/news/2020/07/15/appleton-movie-premiere-dairyland-brew-pub-the-runners-dan-davies
Actor Dan Davies Interview on "Hot Seat with Hal Thompson" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=senyQOPmz7A
Yahoo Entertainment - 'Ed Gein, the Musical' from Omro-raised Dan Davies will get theatrical play debut in Oshkosh
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/ed-gein-musical-omro-raised-090751194.html
Appleton Post-Crescent - Appleton native launching independent film awards: Sean Connery, Neal McCoy among winners - https://www.postcrescent.com/story/entertainment/2019/10/17/dan-davies-appleton-actor-launching-national-independent-film-awards/4001098002/
Chicago Writes Radio Podcast (Chicago Writers Association) - Interview with Dan Davies https://chicagowrites.podbean.com/e/dan-davies-of-renegade-press-llc/
Making Me Bold - A Behind the Scenes Look at Tempting Fate with Actor Dan Davies https://ardisanelson.com/2015/08/13/behind-the-scenes-look-tempting-fate-with-actor-dan-davies/
Night Lite with Pete Schwaba - Civic Media - Heard on 23 radio stations and worldwide via Streaming (Dan Davies Interview) https://civicmedia.us/shows/nite-lite/2024/06/03/eggs-big-feets-dan-davieshour-1
Dan Davies Interviewed on Best of Night Lite with Pete Schwaba - https://civicmedia.us/shows/nite-lite/2025/03/15/weekly-best-of-nite-lite-for-mar-15
Civic Media Radio Podcasts - Dan Davies Interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9_-js_z_c
WHBY 103.5 FM & 1400 AM (Woodward Communications) Dan Davies Interview - https://www.whby.com/2019/05/13/bike-lanes-wedc-audit-dan-davies-drunk-driving/
Fresh Take with Josh Dukelow Radio Show (Dan Davies Interview) Woodward Communications https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/fresh-take-with-josh-dukelow-218957/episodes/why-we-take-risks-actor-dan-da-126755578
"Mornings with Laura Lee & Cutter" WAPL 105.7 FM (Dan Davies Interview) https://www.spreaker.com/episode/interview-writer-actor-producer-dan-davies--62234179
WAPL 105.7 FM (Dan Davies Interview) https://www.spreaker.com/episode/interview-dan-davies--60135119
London Director Awards (Interview with Dan Davies) https://londondirectorawards.com/blog/dan-davies
Milwaukee Independent Film Awards (Interview with Dan Davies) https://milwaukeeindependentfilmawards.com/red-carpet-interviews DeeMC1970 (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also as an addendum to my last post; the acclaimed author of the novel, I've Seen Dead People: Diary of a Deputy Coroner, Donna Francart wrote a book about Dan's film "Ed Gein, the Musical" and in it is quite a bit of information about Dan Davies' life as well as lots of factual information about Dan Davies as a screenwriter, filmmaker and as an actor.
Ed Gein, The Musical: A Novel - https://www.amazon.com/Ed-Gein-Musical-Donna-Francart/dp/B0CDN7K9VT
Also, if you have trouble opening up the Dan Davies Interview on NPR-PRI "To the Best of our knowledge" (Aired Nationally on Public Radio in the US on over 300 radio stations) - https://www.ttbook.org/interview/dan-davies-ed-gein-musical DeeMC1970 (talk) 02:24, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What a mess. Thanks to any future participants who are willing to wade through all of these comments and references and assess this article. I appreciate the source assessment table.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Kudos to LastJabberwocky for the thorough source assessment. Echoing Liz's call for a review of the other sources presented here. Thank you!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 15:19, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I appreciate the identified coverage; I'm still not convinced it's enough for an encyclopedic article, but awaiting more opinions on this. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 06:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • In addition to the two previously assessed "postcrescent.com" articles, there are three more articles from the same source ([27], [28], [29]), which is more than the required three sources providing notability, but all of them are from one publication. The rest of the sources from the second bunch are podcast, semi-interview articles (mostly self-published interviews with tid bits of background info about Davies). I'm not sure about the Donna Francart book, Ed Gein, The Musical - A Novel; I couldn't find it on Google Books, and the book sample provided by Amazon doesn't mention Davies. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 06:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think it is pretty clear from the sourcing he passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR/WP:CREATIVE. Yes there are COI issues and the article needs copy editing, but those aren't problems pertinent to AFD.4meter4 (talk) 14:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 16:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.