Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's Health
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | On 11 April 2025, it was proposed that this page be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's health. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
List of your articles that are in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, 2025
editCurrently, this project has about ~11 articles in need of some reference cleanup. Basically, some short references created via {{sfn}} and {{harvnb}} and similar templates have missing full citations or have some other problems. This is usually caused by templates misuse or by copy-pasting a short reference from another article without adding the full reference, or because a full reference is not making use of citation templates like {{cite book}} (see Help:CS1) or {{citation}} (see Help:CS2). To easily see which citation is in need of cleanup, you can check these instructions to enable error messages (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist the monk's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup). See also how to resolve issues.
These could use some of your attention
If you could add the full references to those article/fix the problem references, that would be great. Again, the easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. If after installing the script, you do not see an error, that means it was either taken care of, or was a false positive, and you don't need to do anything else. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Headbomb: all done. TSventon (talk) 22:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:AAGL#Requested move 19 February 2025
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:AAGL#Requested move 19 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:10, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Indira IVF AfD Discussion
editRequesting input on the AfD for Indira IVF at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Indira_IVF. This major Indian fertility chain (150+ centres) has updated coverage, including a 2025 IPO filing (NDTV Profit), a $1.1 billion acquisition (Economic Times), and ties to India’s infertility crisis (Economic Times, 2024). Discussion leans "delete" for lacking WP:NCORP depth, but I argue it meets WP:ORGCRIT with women’s health significance. Seeking neutral views—does this merit inclusion? MH-wiki2025 (talk) 08:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 11 April 2025
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 16:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's Health → Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's health
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Social Work → Wikipedia:WikiProject Social work
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular Biology → Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular biology
– It is conventional to name WikiProjects according to a main article, without extra capitalization (e.g. as in WP:WikiProject Military history), thus avoiding the project template linking a miscapitalized redirect (e.g. as shows up in the maintenance report WP:Database reports/Linked miscapitalizations in template space). Dicklyon (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 08:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note to closer: if these are moved, they require quite a lot of additional maintenance which must happen right after. Including:
- renaming all project sub-pages (e.g. sub-pages)
- renaming and updating the category and links at the project banner templates (e.g. Template:WikiProject Women's Health)
- sending all of the categories to be renamed per WP:C2D (e.g. Category:WikiProject Women's Health and all sub-categories)
- updating User:Magioladitis/WikiProjects so the tools aren't conflicting
- Gonnym (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology shows up in WP:Database reports/Linked miscapitalizations in template space because it links to mainspace with Molecular Biology rather than Molecular biology. It's a similar situation for Template:WikiProject Women's Health and Template:WikiProject Social Work.
- I worry that changing the project name can have more knock-on effects than what Gonnym listed as well, but I'm not savvy enough to know of more. Maybe the article alerts bot needs updating and project statistics tracking may need updating too. Since, I also don't see much benefit to changing capitalization in project space I would be opposed to the move. ⇌ Synpath 14:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- It's not that hard. I'll do it. All three of them link to main space via their templates, due to how the meta-template treats project names. Or can someone find another way to fix them to get them off the report? Dicklyon (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that the text was generated through a module (Module:WikiProject banner). Setting
MAIN_ARTICLEto the mainspace article should do the trick. I tried it out in the Template:WikiProject Molecular Biology/sandbox and it looks like it works. ⇌ Synpath 17:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)- OK, I'm trying that via 2 edits and an edit request. I still think it's a good idea to use a more normal naming pattern for these. Dicklyon (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that the text was generated through a module (Module:WikiProject banner). Setting
- It's not that hard. I'll do it. All three of them link to main space via their templates, due to how the meta-template treats project names. Or can someone find another way to fix them to get them off the report? Dicklyon (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Synpath - too much effort for too little gain. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:39, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm willing to put in the effort. Dicklyon (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Are these proper names? — BarrelProof (talk) 01:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- You mean the WikiProject names? They are not conventionally treated as such. And since they're not article titles, and not visible in articles, our usual style conventions are not really very relevant. It's more about having consistent conventions, and avoiding links to overcapitalized redirects showing up in maintenance reports. Dicklyon (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- My impression is that the name of a government project or a company project or multi-company research or product development project, like the name of a specific institution, would ordinarily use title case in English (Manhattan Project, Human Genome Project, Operation Warp Speed, Project Hula). — BarrelProof (talk) 01:40, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- You mean the WikiProject names? They are not conventionally treated as such. And since they're not article titles, and not visible in articles, our usual style conventions are not really very relevant. It's more about having consistent conventions, and avoiding links to overcapitalized redirects showing up in maintenance reports. Dicklyon (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. I object to imposing capitalization rules outside of article space. We have important but often tedious arguments about capitalization and other minor variations in article titles every day and I see little benefit to bringing these to behind-the-scenes pages. The technical aspects and full implications of the proposed move are beyond my understanding, but given the divergent opinions expressed by knowledgeable editors and the alternative fixes proposed, I favor maintaining the status quo with the project names and not opening this can of worms. Lastly, I do read these as proper names or titles for WikiProjects (not Wiki projects), as BarrelProof's question suggests. Per my first point, I would not impose a universal style nor request a move for WP:WikiProject Military history and the like, and I would grant pretty wide latitude for WikiProjects to name and style themselves. --MYCETEAE 🍄🟫—talk 14:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose inconsistent capitalization. Proper sentence case would be "WikiProject women's health". But these are proper noun phrases so they don't need lowercasing. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose: Per David Eppstein and Myceteae. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)