Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrianov Herman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrianov Herman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:ATHLETE. Ref #3 is apparently to a print ad of a restaurant but does not mention Andrianov by name. Ref #1 cannot be validated because it is behind a registration wall. Ref #4 is a single photo showing a skater in a competition. Also, so far as I can tell (using Google Translate at this point), 2 of the sources are not independent of the subject (and so fail WP:IRS). I am also concerned because, if the 2002 birthdate is correct. then the subject is a minor. Shearonink (talk) 01:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unfortunately as I thank the author for their efforts with making an article but this is also questionable for WP:ENTERTAINER and there's unlikely enough convincing sources for a better article. SwisterTwister talk 03:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hatting !votes by confirmed sockpuppets per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Mz7 (talk) 04:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Deleting Andrianov Herman is a very famous actor and a tv host in Russian federetion, all that i have listed in an article about him, is absolutely true. I personally have seen him on national TV and in magazines. He is a great actor and deserves to be on wikipedia. WIKIPEDIARUS talk 3:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep this article We should totally keep this article, this person is really famous and we love him! He is 100% eligible to be on Wikipedia. RUSSIANWIKIPEDIA talk 4:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Leave the article I can totally say, that Herman Andrianov (Герман Андрианов) is meeting all of the requirments to be on wikipedia and should be here! TheMoscowMan talk 5:12, 20 February —Preceding undated comment added 05:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
HERMAN SHOULD BE HERE All Russia knows Herman!!!!! He was on national TV for several times, he was also shown in cinemas!!! We deffinetly should NOT delete his wikipedia page. RussianFederationWiki talk 5:47, 20 February 2016

Delete Obviously not a serious contribution to the encyclopedia with overwhelming claims, including figure skating championships that would have many sources if a 10 year-old won them. The four nominations above me also should probably not copy SisterTwister's sig style if they hope to be taken seriously and not as a four-vote WP:SOCK whose first contributions were to this AfD. Nate • (chatter) 05:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the coverage of the actor in reliable sources doesn't appear to be strong enough.

On a side note, what is with this common theme of the green-colored signatures in this discussion? I just thought that was interesting. edtiorEهեইдအ😎 09:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as G3:Blatant Hoax. I find no evidence this kid is an actor or has the talent to skate in a competition. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 13:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WIKIPEDIARUS for a list of the Confirmed sock puppets that have !voted here.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.