- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sean Lessard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As researcher not notable; books are not helping with notability either. No reliable sources. Once upon a daylight dreary (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - meets GNG based on significant coverage in three news articles that are about him and his work, and three book reviews on his work in peer-reviewed academic journals. Netherzone (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Education. Netherzone (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as above. For me, three reviews of coauthored books would be borderline for WP:AUTHOR, but the profiles of him in national media are enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with David Eppstein. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.