- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:16, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Slyce Apparel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable clothing maker. The WP:BEFORE did not show this company to be notable for an entry. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Sports, Tennis, and Brazil. Ednabrenze (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:NCORP. It's not a notable brand. Svartner (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:13, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as per Wcquidditch. 🟥⭐ talk to me! 00:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete not really notable, too soon. I checked the sources according to WPbefore, but nothing there. --J. P. Fridrich (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - it has some followers and customers, but the lack of engagement (3 to 5 comments per Instagram posting) and no reliable sources, leads me to suspect b0ts have been purchased. Bearian (talk) 01:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.