Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torquato Cardilli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep because the article has been substantially referenced and improved after Sefringle's nomination (which was valid at the time). Non-admin closure. YechielMan 23:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Torquato Cardilli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article has no sources or evidence of any notability. Also written like propaganda. Sefringle^Talk 03:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletions. -- Sefringle^Talk 03:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. -- Sefringle^Talk 03:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Arrow740 03:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable as Italian ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Further notable as having converted to Islam, which is not usually notable in itself, but would be in an instance like this. Needs references, but removal seems a little pointless. DGG 05:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Ambassador is a high position in foreign relations politics, and anyone holding that position is notable in my opinion. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I have added a few sources. Some more might be needed, but the best ones are probably in Italian. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Both because of his ambassadorship, long service in Italian diplomacy, and interesting personal story Misheu 08:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Quite significant and adequately sourced now. Stammer 09:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I am at a complete loss as to how the Italian Ambassador to Angola can conceivably be described as having no "notability."  RGTraynor  14:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above keeps. → AA ^{(talk • contribs)} — 14:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above, national ambassadors are notable RJaguar3 | u | t 17:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.