This following contains this project's guidance on creating and improving articles within its scope, and in particular, contains advice on how to apply some of Wikipedia's sitewide policies and guidelines. Please note that this guidance is not thorough, not binding, and has not been reviewed by the Wikipedia community, and that this project does not own any article within its scope, so you may freely ignore any or everything below, and should ignore anything which conflicts with sitewide policy, guidance, or consensus.[n 1]

Before drafting

edit

Before drafting an article, you may wish to ensure that its subject or topic is encyclopaedic (meets WP:NOT), notable (meets WP:N), and well-sourced (to meet WP:V later on). You may further wish to ensure that doing so would not be a conflict of interest (to meet WP:COI).

Notability

edit

An encyclopaedic subject or topic is notable (and so may warrant its own article) if it meets at least one of the following guidelines. Else, the subject or topic likely does not warrant a stand-alone article, though it may nonetheless warrant inclusion in a closely related article or list (per WP:FAILN).[n 2]

WikiProject Belize guidance on meeting notability policy for articles within scope
Notability guideline Project advice
General notability (WP:GNG) No particular advice.[n 3]
List notability (WP:NLIST) The subject or topic of a list article must meet notability guidelines (with exceptions).
  •  Y Navigation lists are exempted.
  •  Y Some simple lists (List of Xs) may be exempted (very rarely).
  •  Y Some complex lists (List of Xs of Y) may be exempted (very rarely).[n 4]
Fringe theory notability (WP:FRINGE) No particular advice.
Academics notability (WP:PROF) No particular advice.
Astronimical object notability (WP:NASTRO) No particular advice.
Book notability (WP:BK) No particular advice.
Event notability (WP:EVENT) No particular advice.
Film notability (WP:NF) No particular advice.
Geographic feature notability (WP:NGEO) No particular advice.
Music notability (WP:NMG) No particular advice.
Number notability (WP:NNUM) No particular advice.
Organisation or company notability (WP:ORG) No particular advice.
People notability (WP:BIO) No particular advice.
Species notability (WP:NSPECIES) No particular advice.
Web notability (WP:WEB) No particular advice.

Verifiability

edit

To draft a well-sourced article later on, independent and reliable sources ought to exist for its subject or topic.[n 5]

WikiProject Belize guidance on meeting verifiability policy for articles within scope
Verifiability guideline Project advice
Independent sources (WP:IS) Use independent sources.[n 6]
  •  N The Times and Guardian are not independent of their parties (PUP and UDP, respectively).
  •  N At least some government or government-funded works from Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Spain, the UK, and the US may not be disinerested or third-party sources for certain topics.[n 7]
Reliable sources (WP:RS) Use reliable sources.
  •  Y No Belizean source has yet had their reliability and use on Wikipedia frequently discussed (in WP:RSP, as of July 2025).[n 8]
  •  Y No Belizean source has yet been deprecated (in WP:DEPS, as of July 2025).[n 9]
Primary sources (WP:PRIMARY) Avoid primary sources.[n 10]
Secondary sources (WP:SECONDARY) Prefer secondary sources.
Tertiary sources (WP:TERTIARY) Reputable tertiary sources may be used.[n 11]
  •  N Reputable tertiary sources (university textbooks, almanacs, encyclopaedias) from Belize are exceedingly rare, though some on or relevant to Belize do exist.
Digital sources Digital (digitised or born-digital) sources on or from Belize are quite limited.
  •  Y Many websites from Belize are not in the .bz ___domain.
  •  N Many websites in the .bz ___domain are not from Belize.
  •  Y Do preemptively archive (eg in IA) any Belizean webpages, as their URL addresses are very rarely stable (even for government).
  •  N Many Belizean websites or webpages are now defunct (even official ones; but possibly archived, eg in IA).
  •  Y Some legitimate Belizean websites may not use https.
  •  Y For some legitimate Belizean websites, some of their webpages may not be indexed by search engines (eg Google), even if some are.
  •  Y Few early or pre-2000s sources are digitised, and only some contemporaneous sources are (as of July 2025).[n 12]
  •  N Nothing close to gov.uk nor data.gov nor legislation.gov exists.
  •  N Many legitimate Belizean entities (including governmental) have little or no online presence.
Sources in Belizean English Sources in Belizean English are quite limited.
  •  N At least some sources from Belize are not written in Belizean English (especially post-1980s).
  •  N No sources from overseas are written in Belizean English.
Sources in Caribbean English Sources in Caribbean English are limited.
  •  Y Most sources from the West Indies (news, UWI Press, Ian Randle, Macmillan) seem to be written in Caribbean English.
  •  N Few non-West Indian sources seem to be written in Caribbean English.
  •  N Quite a few West Indian sources do not mean to include Belize when they refer to the West Indies or Caribbean.
Sources in foreign English variants Sources in foreign English variants (especially American) are not so limited.
  •  Y Quite a few of these sources mean to include Belize when they refer to Latin America (ie they mean Central and South America or Latin America and the Caribbean).
  •  N Quite a few of these sources do not mean to include Belize when they refer to North America (ie they mean Northern America).
Sources in foreign languages Sources in foreign languages (especially Spanish) are limited.
  •  N Quite a few or many Hispanic sources do not mean to include Belize when they refer to Central America.
Grey literature The grey literature on Belize is not so limited, though that from Belize is.
  •  N There is no ProQuest equivalent for Belize (nor are Belizean theses or dissertations available in ProQuest).
  •  Y ProQuest and similar collections (EThOS, OATD) do hold theses or dissertations on or regarding Belize.
  •  Y Quite a few foreign government entities, NGOs, organisations, and some from Belize, publish reports on or regarding Belize.
Academic sources There are quite a few academic sources on Belize, though very few from the same.
  •  Y Some books by Belizean publishers (Cubola, Angelus, Image Factory) are academic works.
  •  Y Some Belizean schools (UB, St John's) and institutions (NICH) publish academic works.
Press The Belizean press corps is quite small, and foreign press on Belize is quite limited.
  •  N There are no investigative journalists nor papers in Belize.
  •  N There are very few local journalists or papers in Belize.
  •  N Only some non-print media publish transcripts.
  •  N Some legitimate press or media may make their work (or some of it) available only on social media (especially Facebook).[n 13]
  •  N Factchecking (especially of 'minor' details) by at least some papers or media outlets does not seem to be so rigorous.[n 14]
  •  N There is no state-sponsored press nor media in Belize.
  •  N Belizean student press or media is exceedingly rare or nonexistent.
  •  N There are no Belizean news agencies nor wire services.
Sources of visuals Visual media sources (digital or otherwise) from Belize are exceedingly rare, and on Belize are limited.
Sources of data Data sources (digital or otherwise) from Belize are exceedingly rare, and on Belize are limited.
Standard references Standard reference works or sources from Belize are exceedingly rare, and on Belize are limited.
  •  N No detailed GLAM catalogues exist, though a few sparse ones do.
  •  N No routine chronological work (like Annual Register) exists, though a few papers cover this topic.
  •  Y Routine statistical reports are available since the 19th cent Blue Books, but are gappy or very gappy.[n 15]
  •  N No compendium of historical statistics exists.
  •  N No detailed authorities on natural persons (like the DNB) exist.
  •  N No detailed authorities on corporate persons exist.
  •  N No detailed authorities on geographical names (gazetteers) exist, though may be glossed from censuses, maps, and authorities by foreign governments (eg US GNS).
  •  N No style guides exist.
  •  N No law reports exist, though high courts covered by CommonLII.
  •  N No Hansard exists.
  •  N Registers of antiquities, historical sites, landmarks, or monuments do not exist or are not public, and may not be detailed in the latter case
  •  Y Current terrestrial maps and charts are available from the Lands and Surveys Department, but not online nor by post, and may not be as detailed.
  •  Y A few dictionaries or glossaries are available for some languages or dialects.
  •  Y Government Gazettes are available since the 19th cent Honduras Gazette, but record is gappy.
  •  Y Codified constitutional documents are available since the 18th cent Burnaby's Code.
  •  Y Compilations of primary legislation are available since the 19th cent, but are gappy (include only substantive acts).
  •  N Few compilations of secondary legislation are available.
  •  N No compilations nor catalogues of parliamentary nor government papers (eg command papers, so on) are available.
Freely-licensed sources Freely or openly-licensed work from Belize is exceedingly rare, and on Belize is limited.
  •  N Government does not release works under an open government licence.
  •  N Government retains full (not Crown) copyright of their works.
  •  Y There are a couple (new) open access journals (eg J of Bzean Research).
Self-published sources Avoid self-published sources (with exceptions).[n 16]
  •  N Some books by Belizean publishers (Cubola, Angelus, Image Factory) might count as self-published works.[n 17]
  •  N Some journals from (or describing themselves as from) Belize may be predatory.

Drafting

edit

Before publishing an article, you may wish to ensure that it is neutral (meets WP:NPOV), not original research (meets WP:NOR), and verifiable (meets WP:V). You may further wish to follow the common Manual of Style. Please do add {{WPBZ}} to the draft's talk page.

Layouts

edit

Templates

edit

After publishing

edit

After publishing an article, you may wish to ensure that it is categorised and not orphaned. Please do ensure {{WPBZ}} is in the article's talk page (without |class=draft in the banner nor banner shell). You may further wish to categorise the article using the following schema.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e This is a citation or explanatory footnote for "...  ranked number 13".
  2. ^ a b c This is a citation or explanatory footnote for "but  ... end".
  1. ^ Please do report any instances of the latter in Talk. This guidance assumes you're mostly familiar with main policies and guidelines (see List of policies and guidelines). New editors may wish to peruse Help:Your first article and Help:After your first article first.
  2. ^ Notability guidelines outline how suitable something is for its own article or list, but do not apply to nor limit content within articles or lists (per WP:NNC). In Belize's case, WP:NOPAGE may be particularly relevant, given current state and size of literature on and from the country.
  3. ^ Note meeting GNG requires at least one (in select cases) or multiple (in most cases) secondary sources.
  4. ^ Technically no present consensus here. Some or many Belize-related lists (List of Belizean Xs or List of Xs-preposition-Belize) may be deemed complex lists, but see this N talk regarding their notability.
  5. ^ Reliable sources ought to be published and accessible too (made available to the public in some form, and made available for review in some form, respectively). See WP:PUBLISH.
  6. ^ See WP:NIS on allowed uses of non-independent sources (for noncontroversial details, with attribution, but not for claims of notability nor controverial details).
  7. ^ Political topics obviously, but even topics not immediately or obviously political. For instance, historical or geographical works from these sources might have a vested interest in some territorial dispute involving Belize (or predecessor states). Similarly, works from or funded by the Belize government might have a vested interest in topics or claims regarding Cuba or Venezuela (given close ties). Excludes works with no vested interest in a given topic or outcome, even if their coverage of said topic is biased or not even-handed.
  8. ^ Which is to say they have had relatively little scrutiny, not that they are thereby reliable.
  9. ^ Which is not to say that they are thereby reliable.
  10. ^ But where allowed, use with caution and do not interpret, evaluate, analyse, nor synthesise. Reputable primary sources allowed 'for specific facts' (WP:RSPRIMARY) ie 'to make straightforward, descriptive statements of fact' (WP:PRIMARY). See WP:PRIMARYUSE for details.
  11. ^ See WP:TERTIARYUSE for details.
  12. ^ For instance, many recent Reporter issues or stories are not available on their website.
  13. ^ For instance, Jose A Sanchez, Cayo Scoop, Corozal Times. Very difficult to discover and archive; allowed use in very few cases (see WP:SELFSOURCE).
  14. ^ For instance, misspelt names, rounded dates or dates off by a few days, rounded tallies or tallies off by a few marks, possibly unfaithful or weirdly formatted digitisations of older material, possibly unfaithful or weirdly formatted transcripts, so on. At least some might have to be treated as well-established tabloids (to be used with care; see § Tabloids; issue does not seem to warrant questionable source designation though). 'Minor' details are never or almost never corrected after the fact, though news of national import is nearly always covered in more than one source, allowing editors to cross-check stories.
  15. ^ Including censuses since late 18th cent.
  16. ^ See § Using self-published sources on allowed uses of self-published sources.
  17. ^ Pay-to-publish, significant author control, so on.
  18. ^ But do provide prefix and post-nominals in article itself.
  19. ^ Or add and link to a Names or Etymology section immediately following lead.
  20. ^ Or district name if latter is still ambiguous eg Blue Creek, Orange Walk and Blue Creek, Toledo, not Blue Creek, Belize.
  21. ^ May see Google ngrams for global and foreign English variants.
  22. ^ Though note Northern, Central, and Southern Belize, and South Side, Belize City, may soon attain proper name status, in which case capitalisation (Central Belize not central Belize) would be advised.
  23. ^ Italicise via ''word_or_phrase_here''.
  24. ^ But use emphasis judiciously. Italicise via {{em}} eg is {{em|not}} for is not.
  25. ^ Italicise via ''word_or_phrase_here''. Includes terms of art.
  26. ^ Italicise via {{lang}} eg {{lang|bzj|dis lee bwai}} for dis lee bwai.
  27. ^ But use editorial emphasis judiciously. Italicise via {{em}} eg "… is {{em|not}}." [emphasis added]. for "... is not." [emphasis added].
  28. ^ Ellipses as three unspaced dots ... not the precomposed character nor three spaced dots . . .. Precede with non-breaking space {{nbsp}} (but follow instead when ellipsis opens the quote). Do not bracket (except when ellipses used elsewhere in quote represent pauses of speech or missing parts of words).
  29. ^ In article text, near quote.
  30. ^ But not glyphs nor ligatures.
  31. ^ For quotes of over about forty words or one paragraph, quote via {{blockquote}}. Attribute in preceding sentence.
  32. ^ That is, translations from quoted text and translations by editor. For editorial translations, do further quote the original via {{lang}}.
  33. ^ Use {{' "}} or {{" ' "}} for quotes marks in immediate succession eg it.'" not it.'" nor it.' ".
  34. ^ But use only a space if the latter would confuse or alter meaning, a comma if it would be required were the quote a paraphrase, and a colon for quotes of one or more complete sentences.
  35. ^ Place punctuation just after the closing quotation mark (with exceptions for quotes of or which form complete sentences).
  36. ^ Place footnotes immediately after the text to which they apply if their adjacent punctuation is a bracket or dash eg use ranked number 13[1]) was or ranked number 13[1] – was.
  37. ^ But use US$ not $ when converting to US dollars to avoid ambiguity.
  1. Blench R (15 Mar 2013). "A Dictionary of Belize English" (Draft). Belmopan, Belize. pp. i, 35.
  2. Crosbie P, ed. (2009) [First published 2007]. English–Kriol Dictionary (Reprint of 1st ed.). Belmopan, Belize: Belize Kriol Project. pp. xii, 465. ISBN 978-976-95165-1-9.
  3. Lehmann C (16 Dec 2018). "Alfabetos alternativos". La lengua maya de Yucatán (Blog). Erfurt, Germany.