User:Sun Creator/AFD


User page	Talk Page	To Do List	INFO	AFD	Control Panel	More

Checkuser pages
Requests: Unlisted • IP check • On hold Archives: Main • Older • IP checks • Unsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk Overview • Noticeboard • Procedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through: WP:RFCU/C/P

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL WP:N WP:CLS WP:LIST WP:RS

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< August 28	August 30 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Academic Structure of Indiana University Bloomington

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a directory of academic departments and units of colleges and universities. An article could plausibly be written about this topic but it would bear no resemblance to this bare listing of academic departments and units. ElKevbo (talk) 04:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Fain House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find information that would support a standalone article about Fain House, not even on the Carson–Newman University website. There is no evidence that Fain House was declared a heritage site or historical place. There is not even a decent reference to include a phrase about the building in the Carson-Newman University article. The building fails WP:NBUILD. Some parts of the section on the Fain Family may be subject of a separate article: the 63 Tennessee Infantry Regiment and col. Richard G. Fain. These articles would be best built from scratch. WP:TNT Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 04:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Tennessee. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 04:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Blue Isle Studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to lack standalone notability and fails WP:NCORP - furthermore, no obvious target for redirection since there two separate articles on games they made. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Canada. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Empower Work

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the cited sources are direct and in-depth enough to pass WP:ORGDEPTH. There are a few references like this and this that discuss its bot in detail but are not directly about the organization. The founder of the organization, Jaime-Alexis Fowler, is a former public relations and media executive so this kind of coverage is expected to exist. Fails WP:NORG. Gheus (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Valiama Narain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the information does not establish any general notability about this person. The only result on Google Books is an obscure book written in 1989, so there is a lack of significant coverage. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Wispr Flow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Cited sources are mostly blogs, PR-based articles, funding rounds, launch of products, all come under WP:CORPTRIV. Lacks direct and in-depth articles to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Gheus (talk) 03:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Jusuf Zimeri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find WP:GNG level sources. Most of the cited sources are self-published or connected to the source, and the ones that aren't make only trivial mention of the subject. Subject also does not seem to qualify for any WP:NPROF criteria. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hatem Bouabid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. He did not finish sole Olympic event. LibStar (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Tunisia. LibStar (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Blake Welsh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage by the sources in the article. Their name has been mentioned reasonably frequently in connection with discovering vulnerabilities, however not a single article spends any time discussing the subject aside from crediting them with the discovery. Brandon (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Computing. Brandon (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
There is precedent for similar cases where security researchers were kept despite most coverage being in the context of vulnerabilities. For example, in the AfD for Jason Parker (security researcher) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Parker_(security_researcher)

(2024), the article was not deleted. Editors there noted that repeated attribution in independent, reliable sources across multiple incidents demonstrated sufficient notability, even if no single profile piece existed. This situation is comparable. AxiomGaming (talk) 16:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I'm nothing if not consistent: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Parker (security researcher) (2nd nomination). Brandon (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Brandon has stated "I'm nothing if not consistent" (here) and previously "Please ignore the admin icon, I'm just someone who used to spend too much time on Wikipedia and enjoys computer security. My AfD nominations end with the article being kept as often as anyone else" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jason_Parker_(security_researcher)

). In the second nomination for that article, he also argued: "discovering vulnerabilities, even if notable, does not make the discoverer notable" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jason_Parker_(security_researcher)_(2nd_nomination).

The reasoning in this discussion seems different from those earlier AfDs on similar subjects, raising concerns about consistency in applying WP:SIGCOV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#significant_coverage. Per WP:NPOV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view, each case should be judged neutrally on the basis of independent sources and coverage, not on an editor's changing stance across discussions. AxiomGaming (talk) 19:26, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to note that the inclusion of this discussion in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions is directly supported by a reliable source. For example, TechCrunch explicitly confirmed my Maryland connection, stating: "and Welsh is a student at Anne Arundel Community College in Maryland." (TechCrunch, June 30, 2015) https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/30/vulnerability-in-security-service-lifelock-could-have-exposed-logins-and-passwords/. This demonstrates clear sourcing for the Maryland relevance of the article. AxiomGaming (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

The standard is significant coverage, not merely being mentioned in passing by a reliable source. Brandon (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ian_Coldwater, coverage of my work is significant - multiple reliable sources directly reported on vulnerabilities I discovered, not merely in passing. Several of these disclosures were substantial, involving adversaries potentially gaining access to the personal information of entire customer bases at companies such as MetroPCS, Verizon, and Charter. AxiomGaming (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

AfD debates do not set precedent and no consensus outcomes with 2 participants are especially unpersuasive. Coverage of your work is not the threshold, there needs to be significant coverage of you. Your name and place of residence does not constitute a Wikipedia article. Brandon (talk) 07:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:SIGCOV, significant coverage means more than a passing mention, but does not require that the subject be the sole focus of an article. In this case, multiple independent, reliable outlets (Vice, TechCrunch, Gizmodo, The Register, BuzzFeed, etc.) provided detailed reporting on vulnerabilities that directly attributed their discovery to the subject. This meets the standard for significant coverage under WP:BIO. AxiomGaming (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete as WP:BLP article subject lacks WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS to WP:V claims beyond the discovery. Don't think this person counts for WP:BLP1E. Discovery used in a WP:UNDUE fashion with regards to notability. Nayyn (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Per WP:SIGCOV, significant coverage means more than a passing mention, but does not require the subject to be the sole focus of an article. In this case, multiple independent and reliable outlets directly attributed discoveries to me:

The Register: "Cinder researchers Eric Taylor and Blake Welsh say the vulnerabilities were simple to exploit up until a patch was dropped."

https://www.theregister.com/2015/11/16/metropcs_patches_hole_that_opened_10_million_user_creds_to_plunder/

Vice: "Security researchers Eric Taylor and Blake Welsh, who both work at secure payments firm Cinder, found the bug in mid-October."

https://www.vice.com/en/article/nasty-bug-in-metropcs-website-left-personal-data-of-subscribers-open-to-hacker/

TechCrunch: "Welsh is a student at Anne Arundel Community College in Maryland. They have previously discovered basic but dangerous vulnerabilities at PayPal."

https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/30/vulnerability-in-security-service-lifelock-could-have-exposed-logins-and-passwords/

https://web.archive.org/web/20160318225931/https://www.paypal.com/webapps/mpp/security-tools/wall-of-fame-honorable-mention

Yahoo News: "Cinder researchers Eric Taylor and Blake Welsh say the vulnerabilities were simple to exploit…"

https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/2015-11-15-metropcs-site-exposed-subscriber-data.html

Fierce Wireless: "Report: MetroPCS customers' personal information had been vulnerable due to website security."

https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/report-metropcs-customers-personal-information-had-been-vulnerable-due-to-website-security

in addition to coverage in multiple independent reliable sources

The AT&T Bug Bounty Hall of Fame (archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20181228020539/https://bugbounty.att.com/hof.php#archive

) explicitly lists Blake Welsh under the research group "Cinder." This confirms both individual recognition and organizational affiliation.
These are not trivial mentions they provide direct quotes, organizational context (Cinder), and secondary verification (e.g., TechCrunch on PayPal). This shows repeated, substantive coverage across multiple outlets, which meets the standard for significant coverage under WP:BIO. AxiomGaming (talk) 09:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Correction: In my earlier comment I mistakenly presented the Yahoo News wording as a direct quote. To clarify, the article paraphrases that "Eric Taylor and Blake Welsh" found the vulnerabilities. AxiomGaming (talk) 09:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
To add on, WP:GNG is ultimately the core standard for biographical notability. It requires only significant coverage in independent, reliable sources-not that the subject be the exclusive focus. Here, the combination of TechCrunch, The Register, Vice, Yahoo News, Fierce Wireless, Vice, fastcompany, BuzzFeed and industry recognition (AT&T Bug Bounty Hall of Fame, PayPal Wall of Fame) clearly demonstrates repeated, non-trivial coverage.

In two separate AfDs regarding another cybersecurity researcher (Jason Parker), editor Sohom emphasized: "I think having ArsTechnica, a variety of legal sources, TechCrunch and SC Media go into depth about a specific vulnerability and explicitly accredit the discovery of said vulnerabilities to a person, should push the said person over the bar of WP:GNG, since, such coverage is pretty rare in the field of cybersecurity and would count as significant coverage in my opinion (imo)." This was stated more than once, reinforcing that such sourcing is sufficient for WP:GNG in this field.

That same reasoning applies here. Multiple independent, reliable outlets have provided in-depth reporting, explicit attribution, and contextual detail. Other cybersecurity biographies with weaker or equivalent sourcing have been considered to meet WP:GNG, and applying the same standard consistently, this article does as well.

Furthermore, WP:V appears to be covered, as the cited articles contain verifiable facts and attribution. In addition to multiple independent news outlets, industry organizations themselves (AT&T Bug Bounty Hall of Fame, PayPal Wall of Fame) have validated and listed me by name on their official websites. This provides independent verification alongside the press coverage, ensuring compliance with the verifiability requirement.

Additionally:

Per WP:RS, the outlets cited here TechCrunch, The Register, Vice, Yahoo News, and Buzzfeed, and Softpedia, PayPal and AT&T are all widely recognized as independent, mainstream, and reliable sources that regularly cover technology and cybersecurity. These publications have longstanding editorial oversight, are frequently cited across Wikipedia, and are routinely relied upon in existing articles about technology companies and cybersecurity professionals.
The fact that each of these outlets & companies themselves have Wikipedia entries further supports that the community has already evaluated them as notable, persistent, and generally reliable sources of news. If the community thought they were fundamentally unreliable, they likely wouldn’t be cited so widely, nor have standalone articles explaining their editorial roles and histories.

If coverage in these outlets were discounted, it would set an unusually high bar inconsistent with Wikipedia practice, since many comparable biographies of professionals in this field rely on the very same sources to establish notability. The use of these publications is therefore in line with WP:RS and with how Wikipedia has consistently treated reliable technology journalism & companies.

Given that these sources provided not just passing mentions but detailed coverage explicitly accrediting vulnerabilities and offering organizational/biographical detail, they meet both WP:RS and WP:GNG standards. AxiomGaming (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AxiomGaming, you're bludgeoning. Please step back and let other editors have some input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Mathias Yohannes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. Let'srun (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.. Let'srun (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Brendan Lambe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The only references currently in the article are databases and all I could find elsewhere were some mentions in routine match coverage such as [[1]]. Let'srun (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Georgia (U.S. state), and Virginia. Let'srun (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Maxime Lanet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable, independent sources. The only references currently are databases which provide zero credence to notability, and I was unable to find anything better elsewhere. It appears that the subject may have written a book at some point, as evidenced by [[2]], but I'm not seeing a WP:NAUTHOR pass here either. A redirect to France at the 1928 Summer Olympics may be a suitable WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 01:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Sportspeople, Olympics, and France. Let'srun (talk) 01:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Lanet seems to have worked as a journalist after the Olympics [3], [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 02:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Some field hockey coverage here [5] with a brief obituary "necrologie" near the middle of the page, under the "bloc-notes" section [6]. Oaktree b (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete: After a search at the BNF (above), there isn't enough coverage found to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Nadia Ali (actress)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2017 AfD was snowed in favor of retaining the article. I believe this was incorrect. The subject fails ANYBIO. The subject has not received a well known honor nor has the person made a widely recognized contribution to the field. The claim to fame is basically “Muslim adult performer.” This performer post-dates Mia Khalifa’s hijab scene, so Nadia Ali is not any sort of “first,” in the field. Even if she were, what exactly is her contribution here? There were remarks in the first AfD that she was threatened and it got coverage. A woman was threatened online? Hardly a man bites dog situation. If one wants to argue ANYBIO, how was adult entertainment changed by her brief time in the industry? It was not. Even then, ANYBIO (which I maintain she does not meet) is merely a likelihood, not a guarantee. There is substantial overlap between ANYBIO and WP:ENT, so this might be a little redundant, BUT she did not star in many adult films and as I mention in why I believe the subject fails ANYBIO, her short-lived career did not have a unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Even the sources themselves state she did a small number of scenes. WP:EVENT would not consider her notable for any of the scenes had they gone viral.

The other argument is WP:GNG. The sourcing in the article is such: There are two Daily Beast interviews and a quote of her all written by the same author (an actual notable performer). For the purposes of GNG, this would be a single source only if those interviews are considered sufficiently independent of the subject. The other sources are also interviews and press releases.

In the first AfD, someone listed a bunch of sources as a rebuttal. The problem is some run afoul of WP:NEWSORGINDIA and the repetitive natures of those that don’t run afoul make me question the intellectual independence and if such a list was confusing existence with notability. Mpen320 (talk) 00:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mpen320 (talk) 01:41, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Pakistan. jolielover♥talk 02:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Islam. - E. Ux 14:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep: https://www.thetimes.com/culture/tv-radio/article/actress-threatened-after-hijabi-porn-is-unveiled-907jtv92n6p and other articles including interviews seem to show she is notable indeed. ~~Redirect to Pornography in Pakistan, if not enough.~~ [Edited-Forget this stupid redirect idea, please]- E. Ux 14:19, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep: per above. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 19:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep. This subject meets WP:N and there are multiple references discussing her, including The New York Times, Daily Pakistan, and more.[7][8][9] Centralknights (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
The NYT article is an op-ed, the India Today article was provided by AtMigration (which, I believe, supplies articles to multiple websites), the Daily Pakistan article isn’t bylined and The Times article is inaccessible. How does this meet WP:N? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:49, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

There is also Jansatta and The Daily Beast.[10][11] Centralknights (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
The Jansatta article isn’t bylined and the Daily Beast piece is just an interview, with no consensus on its reliability. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:29, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Open to changing my vote if someone brings better WP:THREE sources. Until then, the subject fails WP:GNG per my analysis of the sources mentioned above. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:49, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment: I'm leaning Keep with references 1-3 listed here, and articles in the Daily Beast with a couple of paragraphs about the subject like [12] (ProQuest 1813269656) and [13] (ProQuest 1780576122, part interview). This one [14] pasted as a link above from The Times is a summary of Daily Beast interviews (I think it should count). I'm seriously considering Mpen320's WP:ANYBIO point though. One could argue that being one of the first Muslim porn actresses might not be notable, but there is coverage of the subject, and the ANYBIO argument can be subjective. Nnev66 (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I think this discussion might need a bit more time to consider whether sources provided are sufficient.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Abbas Hariri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. The only reference now is a database and all I could find were a few sentences of coverage at [[15]], which claims that the subject died in Vancouver, but I couldn't find anything else to support notability. Let'srun (talk) 01:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Wrestling, and Iran. Let'srun (talk) 01:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Hassen Chaktami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Eliminated in first bout of Olympics. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Olympics, and Tunisia. LibStar (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep – These to me are enough to indicate that there is likely enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG. [16][17][18][19] – Ike Lek (talk) 02:45, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep – Per Ike Lek. Svartner (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Source analysis would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 00:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 00:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Graham Platner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oyster farmer and US Senate candidate. His initial campaign launch received a ton of media coverage, but that's not proof of enduring notability. If he loses the Senate race, will he still be getting this much media attention? Will people still be searching his name in 10 years? Previous discussions have mostly found that being a major-party Senate candidate doesn't automatically make someone notable. See, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Hovde. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kellen Curry for an example of a candidate who generated a ton of media coverage when he first announceed his campaign, but that coverage quickly dried up and his page was deleted. I'd support a redirect to 2026 United States Senate election in Maine. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:51, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Keep. I created this article just over an hour ago and was easily able to populate it with well-sourced content from several full articles devoted entirely to the subject, from major sources like NBC News [20], Politico [21], The Boston Globe [22], and The Guardian [23]. This is not passing coverage but real, biographical content and analysis. Frankly I'm just getting started given the amount of significant coverage this figure is receiving. See also e.g. The New York Times [24], ABC News [25], The American Prospect [26], The Nation [27], as well as local news WGME [28] and Bangor Daily News [29]. Reference to the other AfD discussions in the nom appear to be WP:OTHERSTUFF rather than testament to a consensus on the enduring significance of U.S. senate candidates. Judging by core P&G alone, this figure clearly passes the threshold of WP:GNG, and the purpose of the encyclopedia is well served by compiling this biographical information, which our readers will be very reasonably expecting to find here. Note that per WP:POLITICIAN, an unelected candidate for political office ... can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. Generalrelative (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Noting that the article now has 12 sources, all significant coverage. Generalrelative (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Comment a while back I did a small WP:BEFORE on the subject and found this coverage of the individual not relating to campaign: [30], [31]. Probably not enough but just making a note here Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 01:30, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Interesting, thanks. Generalrelative (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Restore the redirect I created and draftify the attempt at an article. I agree he's not notable. This coverage will pass if he loses. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete: I'm not sure a viral video is enough to show notability, sure he's cool now, but that doesn't give us notability as explained by the nom. Coverage is all rather recent, mostly around the campaign or the video. Oaktree b (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep: Nominating this an hour after the stub was created is demolishing the house while it's still being built a wee bit. Keep for now, as the RS added since shows sigcov; if coverage isn't sustained, then put it up again in the future. In the meantime, I'm leaning WP:TOOSOONDEL. Nil🥝 03:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Kane Roberts (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No serious indication of notability in my WP:BEFORE search or the sources. Should probably redirect back to the artist given it is a self-titled album. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 00:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Nil🥝 04:26, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Redirect to Kane Roberts: Falls short of WP:NALBUM – has minimal coverage, and didn't chart or receive certifications AFAICT. Support an {{R from album}} as an AtD. Nil🥝 04:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Danica Leigh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Healthcare professional and congressional candidate. Don't see any argument for notability, be it based on her past positions or the news coverage she's received. I'd support a redirect to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in Illinois#District 7. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Typically a citation to a news article is accepted as proof of a candidate's viability. Given that this candidate's announcement was made only two weeks ago, and that a number of "what to watch for" election articles are expected to publish post-Labor Day, I'd recommend keeping the page live for now. If relevant updates to the article aren't made by end of September, removal would be more appropriate. Tomciav (talk) 02:54, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Natalia Nagovitsina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources PadoqueYT33 (talk) 23:55, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 00:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 August 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Collins (baseball)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't meet the notability criteria, in part because he doesn't appear to have existed. The only "Collins" on the 1892 St. Louis Browns was Bill Collins. There is no player known only as "Collins" from the era. There is another player on the 1892 Browns whose first name isn't known ("Leonard") but his stats don't jibe with this "Collins" guy's stats. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Missouri. Shellwood (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Delete. This was in fact Bill Collins (catcher), who played September 12, 1892. His article was updated well after this article was created, so this one is now obsolete. Wizardman 00:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)